To use this site, please disable the ad blocking feature and reload the page.
This website uses cookies to collect information about your visit for purposes such as showing you personalized ads and content, and analyzing our website traffic. By clicking “Accept all,” you will allow the use of these cookies.
Users accessing this site from EEA countries and UK are unable to view this site without your consent. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
AP Photo/Francisco Seco, File The United States players hold the trophy as they celebrate winning the Women’s World Cup final soccer match against The Netherlands at the Stade de Lyon in Decines, outside Lyon, France on July 17, 2019.
AP
11:57 JST, July 17, 2023
GENEVA (AP) — A risk of overloading women’s soccer players in Europe. Too few competitive games in other parts of the world. Professionalizing domestic leagues too slowly.
One week before the Women’s World Cup kicks off in Australia and New Zealand, global players’ union FIFPRO published analysis on Thursday of its members’ workload on the 32 teams’ road to the July 20-Aug. 20 tournament.
A key takeaway suggested European teams and players with clubs in Europe will be the best prepared to succeed. The first Women’s World Cup expanded to 32 teams includes Haiti, Morocco, Panama and Philippines among teams making their debut.
The squads of England, Spain and Portugal have played the most competitive minutes in the past year, according to FIFPRO research which was hampered by poor data collection for women’s soccer in some countries outside Europe. Those European powers have also suffered an epidemic of serious knee injuries for star players.
Only Europe had a dedicated, stand-alone qualifying tournament for the Women’s World Cup while other confederations’ games counted also as a continental championship or Olympics qualifiers. FIFPRO research showed Brazil played 18 friendly games in a row while Colombia and Argentina both had 16.
“We just feel that denies players further opportunity to have competitive and consequentially meaningful games,” said Sarah Gregorius, FIFPRO strategy director for women’s soccer.
Even the two-time defending champion United States relies heavily on friendlies rather than competitive action.
The UEFA Women’s Champions League also is ahead of other confederations in giving international competition to club teams. FIFA has targeted a Women’s Club World Cup since at least 2019 but no clear project has yet emerged.
“Some players only have access to around 20 matches per year which is just not enough,” Gregorius said in an online briefing. “The professionalization and league expansion is not happening as quick as we’d like to see.”
Gregorius noted a “large disparity in domestic club structures” which sees Tokyo Olympic champion Canada still without a women’s league, while some national leagues have as few as 12 rounds.
Women’s soccer is growing fast and its signature tournament has doubled in size in just 12 years – from 16 teams at the 2011 edition to 32 teams now.
The rapid expansion could risk lop-sided games like the 13-0 win for the United States over Thailand in a group-stage game four years ago.
“The FIFA Women’s World Cup is a fantastic celebration of the women’s game but is also a time to analyze the sometimes-patchy development of the sport,” FIFPRO general secretary Jonas Baer-Hoffmann said in a statement.
