To use this site, please disable the ad blocking feature and reload the page.
This website uses cookies to collect information about your visit for purposes such as showing you personalized ads and content, and analyzing our website traffic. By clicking “Accept all,” you will allow the use of these cookies.
Users accessing this site from EEA countries and UK are unable to view this site without your consent. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
The March 20 earthquake that originated off Miyagi Prefecture occurred at the border of two tectonic plates, the same mechanism as the Great East Japan Earthquake, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency.
The latest earthquake, which had a magnitude of 6.9, erupted on the border between a land tectonic plate and a sea plate that sinks down under the former. This was the same mechanism as the Great East Japan Earthquake (magnitude 9.0), and different from the magnitude-7.2 quake that occurred inside one of the plates off Fukushima Prefecture in February.
When the March 20 earthquake occurred, a tsunami advisory was issued in Miyagi Prefecture. But waves clearly defined as tsunami were not observed, and so the advisory was withdrawn.
The hypocenter of the earthquake was relatively deep at 59 kilometers underground, and thus the distortion of the sea floor, which can cause tsunami, was limited. Fortunately, tsunami did not occur in this case.
The energy produced by the earthquake off Fukushima Prefecture was about four times stronger than that of the March 20 earthquake off Miyagi Prefecture, but a tsunami advisory was not issued at the time of the February earthquake.
Because the height of tsunami waves is also affected by landforms, tsunami advisories and warnings are issued after a decision is made based on data on tsunami waves that occurred in the past in the relevant region.
Prof. Fumihiko Imamura of Tohoku University, an expert in tsunami engineering, thought the issuance of the tsunami advisory was justified.
“Deeply indented ria shorelines stretch along coastal areas of Miyagi Prefecture, and so tsunami waves tend to become high mainly in such places as deep inside bays,” Imamura said. “Because the earthquake occurred in a time period near high tide, special care was necessary.”
The quake recorded an upper five on the Japanese intensity scale of seven.
Injuries rise to 10
The Fukushima prefectural government announced Sunday, the day after the earthquake off Miyagi Prefecture, that a 77-year-old woman in Date, Fukushima Prefecture, suffered a minor injury when she fell inside her home. She was taken to a hospital by ambulance.
According to a Yomiuri Shimbun tally, this brought to 10 the total number of people taken by ambulance to hospitals, mainly because of injuries caused by the quake. There were eight people hurt in Miyagi Prefecture in addition to the 77-year-old woman, and one in Iwate Prefecture.
