To use this site, please disable the ad blocking feature and reload the page.
This website uses cookies to collect information about your visit for purposes such as showing you personalized ads and content, and analyzing our website traffic. By clicking “Accept all,” you will allow the use of these cookies.
Users accessing this site from EEA countries and UK are unable to view this site without your consent. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Courtesy of Revolution+1 Film Partners / Jiji Press A scene from “Revolution+1,” a film modeled on the suspect in the fatal shooting of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
Jiji Press
10:50 JST, October 11, 2022
TOKYO (Jiji Press) — A film modeled on the suspect in the fatal shooting of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe three months ago is drawing controversy as it was screened at some theaters on the day of his state funeral.
One theater ended up canceling the planned screening after receiving a wave of protests against the film, which is based on the 42-year-old suspect, Tetsuya Yamagami.
The film “Revolution+1” was directed by Masao Adachi, an 83-year-old former member of the now-defunct Japanese Red Army, which carried out terrorist attacks around the world in the 1970s and 1980s.
It depicts how the main character, modeled on Yamagami, made a gun and used it. This time, a special 50-minute version of the movie was released that was filmed in eight days from late August.
The full-length version is scheduled to be completed in November and to be shown at theaters across the country. Abe was gunned down while delivering a campaign speech in Nara on July 8.
The special version was to be screened at 13 theaters, but the plan was shelved at one theater due to a series of threatening phone calls and emails.
“Protests were received even by the commercial facility housing the theater,” an official of the theater said. “We canceled the screening for the safety of customers,” the official said.
“I wonder what had forced Yamagami into a corner,” Adachi said in an interview. “I wanted to depict the background of one young man, instead of seeing him as a hero.”
Adachi also said the special version contained a message of protest against the state funeral, which was held in Tokyo on Sept. 27 amid divided public opinion. “I welcome criticism and objections,” he said.
Kenta Yamada, professor of speech law at Senshu University in Tokyo, said that “there should be no obstruction to the screening of films in terms of freedom of expression even if strong voices are raised against different principles and claims.”
Mafumi Usui, professor of social psychology at Niigata Seiryo University in Niigata, said that the production side “should have been a little more careful before releasing the film” as the shooting incident is still under investigation. “The feelings of bereaved family members should also be considered,” he said.
