U.K. expert: Indo-Pacific should not lose priority
17:28 JST, May 6, 2022
Robert Ward, Japan Chair of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, talked about Britain’s tilt toward the Indo-Pacific region in an interview with The Yomiuri Shimbun. The following excerpts from the interview have been edited for clarity.
The carrier strike group [that Britain dispatched to the Indo-Pacific region last year] was diplomatic telegraphing.
Telegraphing diplomatic intent or political intent to the likeminded in the region, including Japan, Australia and nations in Southeast Asia. It’s important to show that the U.K., after Brexit, has a broad view about what it wants to do.
With the invasion of Ukraine, the pressures on [the British government’s Indo-Pacific] tilt are going to be quite intense, because clearly this is the biggest security issue for Europe since the end of the Second World War. Many European countries are going to be wanting to spend more on weapons and defense for Europe.
So I think the risk is that the priorities in Europe overtake the priorities in the Indo-Pacific. And that is partly because of resources. Resources are limited. The crisis in Europe is intense. So that’s potentially where the priority will be. But I think it would be a mistake.
The issues in China are important to everybody. Even though geographically China may be a long way away, politically it is actually quite close because it affects everything that everybody does.
The U.K. can and will have other channels for influence in the Indo-Pacific, one of which is the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership). I think the Indo-Pacific tilt needs to be seen in tandem with the CPTPP.
The CPTPP has security benefits if you think about data. Data is a key component of the civilian economy and also increasingly, the military, AI and so on. The fuel for AI is data, deployed in civilian and military arenas. CPTPP has provisions around data and e-commerce. So that implicitly has a security element to it as well.
It’s about strategic economics. And it’s about rule setting. I think you need to see economic statecraft as part of the U.K.’s broader interaction with the region.
The interview was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun London Correspondent Keita Ikeda.
"Politics" POPULAR ARTICLE
-
Prime Minister Fumio Kishida Promotes Revised NISA Investment Program to Young People; Kishida Focusing on Moving Money From Savings to Investment in a Safe Environment
-
Chinese Ships Stay in Japanese Waters near Senkaku Islands for 2 Days
-
Japan, U.S. to Join Forces on AI, Semiconductors; Seek to Counter China’s ‘Military-Civil Fusion’
-
Japan, U.S. to Work Together for Expanding Marine Product Supply Chains; Countering China’s Economic Coercion
-
84% of People Nationwide Say They Feel Japan’s National Security Is Under Threat
JN ACCESS RANKING
- M6.0 Earthquake Hits Japan’s Tohoku Region; Fukushima, Iwate, Miyagi Prefectures Observe 4 on Japanese Scale With No Risk of Tsunami
- Cherry Blossoms Draw Crowd to Tokyo’s Ueno Park; Viewing Season Kicks Off to Slow Start
- China Mutes Memorialization of Reformer Hu Yaobang; Memories Could Spark Critique of Xi Administration
- Shinkansen Services Suspended After Man ‘Searches for Phone’ on Tracks; Disruption Affects About 14,000 Passengers
- Whaling Mother Ship Built in Japan for 1st Time in 73 Years