
The Tokyo District Court and The Tokyo High Court
18:06 JST, July 1, 2022
TOKYO (Jiji Press) — The Tokyo District Court ruled Thursday that the government’s policy of excluding the sex industry from COVID-19 relief programs was constitutional, rejecting a damages claim by a business operator.
“It’s up to the rational discretion of the administrative authorities to set requirements for receiving aid money as political and policy action. The exclusion is not regarded as discrimination,” presiding Judge Yukito Okada said.
The lawsuit was filed by a woman who runs a business to dispatch sexual massage staff in the Kansai region.
The plaintiff said that excluding sex businesses from the relief programs contradicts the constitutional guarantee of legal equality. She sought ¥4.5 million in damages from the government.
In order to help businesses hurt by the coronavirus crisis, the government started rent subsidies for small companies and grants to help them keep operating.
The government said that the subsidies and grants were meant to help a wide range of businesses regardless of their industry type, but the sex industry was excluded from the list of eligible businesses.
When setting such eligibility standards, the administrative authorities should consider the effectiveness of the spending and its consistency with other policies, Okada said in the ruling.
“The authorities are allowed to make such considerations to obtain taxpayers’ understanding of how public funds are used,” the judge said, adding that wide discretion is given to them as various considerations are made.
Okada concluded that the exclusion of sex businesses had “reasonable grounds” because the authorities are believed to have judged it inappropriate to help sex businesses keep operating using state money in the light of sexual morality among a large majority of the public.
After the ruling, the plaintiff said that it is “a heartless ruling that rejects the sex industry.”
“It’s problematic that the ruling approved the wide discretion of the government using the term ‘political,’” said Yusuke Taira, an attorney for the plaintiff, noting that their team appealed against the ruling.
"Society" POPULAR ARTICLE
-
Tokyo Experiences Temperatures Exceeding 30 C for 1st Time This Year; Other Parts of Japan also See Soaring Temperatures
-
2025 Expo Osaka: Expo Fails to Achieve Pledge of Line-Free Event; Smartphone Data Shows Particular Crowding at East Gate
-
Japan’s Maglev Shinkansen’s Partially Completed Station Unveiled; Station Will Be Only Underground Stop Between Shinagawa, Nagoya
-
2025 Expo Osaka: Japan Pavilion Security Guard Headset Goes Viral on Social Media; Fans Delight at Similarity to Dragon Ball “Scouter”
-
2025 Expo Osaka: Yoshimura Asks Japan Expo Association to Consider Keeping Restaurants, Shops Open until Just before 10 P.M.
JN ACCESS RANKING
-
Toyoda to Become Automobile Business Association of Japan Chairman; to Help Guide U.S. Tariff-Affected Industriessns
-
Visitors to Japan Hit Single-Month Record High in April
-
Japanese Researchers Develop ‘Transparent Paper’ as Alternative to Plastics; New Material Is Biodegradable, Can Be Produced with Low Carbon Emissions
-
Japan to Introduce Car Fuel with Up to 10% Biofuels from Fiscal 2028; Limited Rollout Expected at Areas with Refineries
-
Former North Korean Agent Says Still Many Spies in South Korea Looking to Strain Relations with Japan