Japan’s Weather Agency Calls for Caution Against Quake Prediction Hoaxes; Advises Focus on Disaster Prevention Measures
16:16 JST, August 12, 2024
It is extremely difficult to predict the specific location and date of earthquakes based on current scientific knowledge. The recently issued megaquake advisory called the Nankai Trough Earthquake Extra Information was issued based on the statistical probability of a quake occurring.
According to the Japan Meteorological Agency, a total of 1,437 earthquakes with a magnitude of 7 or greater occurred worldwide from 1904 to 2014. Of these, there were six cases in which a subsequent earthquake of magnitude 7.8 or greater occurred within 50 kilometers of the epicenter of the first quake within seven days.
On Thursday, a magnitude-7.1 earthquake occurred in the Hyuganada Sea at the southwestern edge of the Nankai Trough. The agency judged that the possibility of a megaquake in this area had increased relative to normal times.
The difficulty of accurately predicting earthquakes has been demonstrated by past massive earthquakes. For example, the government has promoted disaster preparedness measures based on the premise of predicting a so-called Tokai earthquake, which is believed to possibly occur on the east side of the Nankai Trough.
However, despite the occurrence of a magnitude-7.3 earthquake off the Sanriku coastal area in the Tohoku region, on March 9, 2011, the government failed to predict the massive magnitude-9 Great East Japan Earthquake that occurred two days later.
Based on this case, the government in 2017 changed its policy, deciding to issue an advisory calling for alert or attention after such incidents as a magnitude-6.8 or stronger earthquake occurring in the same focal area. It did so from the belief that under current scientific knowledge, it was difficult to predict with a high degree of certainty that a Tokai earthquake would occur within two to three days.
Based on such circumstances, the agency now states on its website: “Information that predicts earthquakes by specifying the date, time and location is a hoax. There is no need to be concerned.”
The agency also claims that there is no scientific explanation for the “earthquake clouds” that are claimed to appear before major earthquakes, and that there is no scientific basis for the ability of animals and plants to predict earthquakes.
With the spread of social media posts regarding earthquake prediction, Kiyoshi Takeda, head of the agency’s Office of Large-scale Earthquake Analysis, told reporters Saturday that “People are advised not to be misled by false information and should prepare disaster prevention measures.”
"Society" POPULAR ARTICLE
-
Typhoon Shanshan Forms, Slowly Moves Toward Japan; Govt Says Typhoon No. 10 Likely to Approach Japan Next Week
-
Tokyo Companies Prepare for Ashfall From Mt. Fuji Eruption; Disposal Of Ash, Possibly at Sea, A Major Challenge
-
Shizuoka Pref. City Offers Foreigners Free Japanese Language Classes; Aims to Raise Non-Natives to Daily Conversation Level
-
Typhoon No. 10 Forecast to Develop; Move into Pacific Ocean South of Japan on Aug. 26
-
Strong Typhoon Shanshan Predicted to Approach Western, Eastern Japan Earliest on Wednesday
JN ACCESS RANKING
- Philippines Steps Up Defense of Northernmost Province with Eye on Possible Contingency Involving Taiwan
- Typhoon Shanshan Forms, Slowly Moves Toward Japan; Govt Says Typhoon No. 10 Likely to Approach Japan Next Week
- Tokyo Companies Prepare for Ashfall From Mt. Fuji Eruption; Disposal Of Ash, Possibly at Sea, A Major Challenge
- Shizuoka Pref. City Offers Foreigners Free Japanese Language Classes; Aims to Raise Non-Natives to Daily Conversation Level
- Typhoon No. 10 Forecast to Develop; Move into Pacific Ocean South of Japan on Aug. 26