Japan’s Weather Agency Calls for Caution Against Quake Prediction Hoaxes; Advises Focus on Disaster Prevention Measures
16:16 JST, August 12, 2024
It is extremely difficult to predict the specific location and date of earthquakes based on current scientific knowledge. The recently issued megaquake advisory called the Nankai Trough Earthquake Extra Information was issued based on the statistical probability of a quake occurring.
According to the Japan Meteorological Agency, a total of 1,437 earthquakes with a magnitude of 7 or greater occurred worldwide from 1904 to 2014. Of these, there were six cases in which a subsequent earthquake of magnitude 7.8 or greater occurred within 50 kilometers of the epicenter of the first quake within seven days.
On Thursday, a magnitude-7.1 earthquake occurred in the Hyuganada Sea at the southwestern edge of the Nankai Trough. The agency judged that the possibility of a megaquake in this area had increased relative to normal times.
The difficulty of accurately predicting earthquakes has been demonstrated by past massive earthquakes. For example, the government has promoted disaster preparedness measures based on the premise of predicting a so-called Tokai earthquake, which is believed to possibly occur on the east side of the Nankai Trough.
However, despite the occurrence of a magnitude-7.3 earthquake off the Sanriku coastal area in the Tohoku region, on March 9, 2011, the government failed to predict the massive magnitude-9 Great East Japan Earthquake that occurred two days later.
Based on this case, the government in 2017 changed its policy, deciding to issue an advisory calling for alert or attention after such incidents as a magnitude-6.8 or stronger earthquake occurring in the same focal area. It did so from the belief that under current scientific knowledge, it was difficult to predict with a high degree of certainty that a Tokai earthquake would occur within two to three days.
Based on such circumstances, the agency now states on its website: “Information that predicts earthquakes by specifying the date, time and location is a hoax. There is no need to be concerned.”
The agency also claims that there is no scientific explanation for the “earthquake clouds” that are claimed to appear before major earthquakes, and that there is no scientific basis for the ability of animals and plants to predict earthquakes.
With the spread of social media posts regarding earthquake prediction, Kiyoshi Takeda, head of the agency’s Office of Large-scale Earthquake Analysis, told reporters Saturday that “People are advised not to be misled by false information and should prepare disaster prevention measures.”
"Society" POPULAR ARTICLE
-
Malaysia Growing in Popularity as Destination for Studying Abroad; British-style Education Available at Low Cost
-
‘Women Over 30 Would Have Uteruses Removed’; Remarks of CPJ Leader, Novelist Naoki Hyakuta Get Wide Attention
-
Typhoon Kong-rey to Reach South of Japan’s Okinawa on Thursday; JWA Urges High Alert for Strong Winds, Heavy Rain
-
Typhoon Kong-rey Expected to Turn into Tropical Storm after Possible Pass Over Taiwan
-
Typhoon Kong-rey to Approach Okinawa’s Sakishima Islands on Thursday
JN ACCESS RANKING
- Streaming Services Boost Anime Popularity Overseas; Former ‘Geeky’ Interest More Beloved Among Gen Z than 3 Major U.S. Sports
- G20 Sees Soft Landing for Global Economy; Leaders Pledge to Resist Protectionism as Trump Calls for Imported Goods Flat Tariff
- Chinese Rights Lawyer’s Wife Seeks Support in Japan; Sophie Luo Calls for Beijing to Free Ding Jiaxi, Xu Zhiyong
- Malaysia Growing in Popularity as Destination for Studying Abroad; British-style Education Available at Low Cost
- ‘Women Over 30 Would Have Uteruses Removed’; Remarks of CPJ Leader, Novelist Naoki Hyakuta Get Wide Attention